{"id":755,"date":"2018-04-05T09:13:00","date_gmt":"2018-04-05T09:13:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/111.118.182.80\/~bookstore\/cag-it-audit\/?page_id=755"},"modified":"2018-04-08T15:50:14","modified_gmt":"2018-04-08T10:20:14","slug":"24-meeting-minutes-of-24th-wgita-poland","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/wgita.intosaicommunity.net\/ar\/24-meeting-minutes-of-24th-wgita-poland\/","title":{"rendered":"24 Meeting Minutes of 24th wgita poland"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n

Minutes of the 24th Meeting of the INTOSAI Working Group on IT Audit (Warsaw, Poland, 29 and 30 June 2015)<\/h1>\n

Minutes<\/h2>\n

Download<\/a><\/p>\n

<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n

The 24th meeting of the INTOSAI Working Group on IT Audit (WGITA) was held at Warsaw, Poland on 29 and
\n30 June 2015. The WGITA participants were also invited by SAI – Poland to participate in the joint activities of the WGITA and EUROSAI Working Group on Information Technology on 1st July 2015. The WGITA meeting was presided over by Mr. Shashi Kant Sharma, Comptroller & Auditor General of India and Chairman of the Working Group. The list of delegates who attended the meeting as members and observers are attached as Annexure. The proceedings of the 24th WGITA are as follows: <\/p>\n

Agenda item No. 1: Welcome Address by Mr. Krzysztof Kwiatkowski, President of the Supreme Audit Office of Poland<\/h2>\n

Mr. Krzysztof Kwiatkowski, President of the Polish Supreme Audit Office welcomed all the participants and expressed his appreciation for the work of the group, particularly on the elaboration of the ISSAI 5300 standard. He was convinced that INTOSAI members were anxious to see the results of the meeting as this is the group that tries to address how auditors could catch up with the dynamic IT environment in their work. He also mentioned that the representative of SAI Poland is a member of similar EUROSAI group. Mr. Kwiatkowski complimented the Comptroller and Auditor General of India, Mr. Shashi Kant Sharma, who chaired the group, and wished all participants a fruitful meeting.<\/p>\n

Agenda item No. 2 & 3: Opening remarks by Mr. Shashi Kant Sharma, Comptroller & Auditor General of India and Chairman, WGITA and adoption of Agenda of the 24th WGITA Meeting<\/h2>\n

Mr. Shashi Kant Sharma, Comptroller and Auditor General of India and Chairman, WGITA thanked the President of the Polish Supreme Audit Office and his staff, for the warm and generous hospitality. He also thanked them for the excellent
\narrangements made for hosting the meeting in Warsaw. Mr. Sharma welcomed two new members
\n(SAIs of Georgia and Mauritius) and two new observers (ISACA and AFROSAI-E) to the Working Group. The Chairman, on behalf of all WGITA members, also thanked the SAI of Malaysia for shouldering the responsibilities of hosting and maintaining the website of WGITA. <\/p>\n

The Chairman stated that the Working Group on IT Audit was constantly working to support SAIs in developing their capacity and skills in the audit of Information Technology by facilitating Knowledge Sharing and encouraging bilateral and regional cooperation. He mentioned that the present meeting would jointly review and discuss the progress made by the five IT Projects undertaken by the Working Group as per WGITA Work Plan (2014-2016). Mr. Sharma also intimated
\nthat a survey for shortlisting IT projects for the next Work Plan of WGITA (i.e. 2017-2019) will be sent to all
\nmembers\/observers by the end of August 2015.<\/p>\n

Mr. Sharma further stated that in view of comments from various member SAIs and project team members on the preliminary draft of ISSAI 5300, the same will be redrafted and forwarded to WGITA members\/observers in due course for approval through email communication. Thereafter, Mr. Sharma informed the participants about two new items of the agenda i.e. items no.
\n10 \u2013 Audit Management System and no. 14 \u2013 WGITA\u2019s role in management of Big Data.<\/p>\n

Afterwards, the Chairman placed the Agenda of the meeting before the Working Group, which was accepted without comments. <\/p>\n

Agenda item No. 4: Update on website of the Working Group on IT Audit<\/h2>\n

Ms. Carolina Muyang Lileng made a presentation on the website of the Working Group (www.intosaiitaudit.org) and information that can be found there e.g. materials from the group\u2019s previous meeting in Kuwait, IDI handbook as well as archived issues of “IntoIT Journals”.<\/p>\n

Agenda item No. 5: Work Plan (2014-2016): Progress report on Project-1 titled “IT Governance”<\/h2>\n

Mr. Daniel Jezini from SAI – Brazil gave a presentation on the \u201cGovernance Evaluation Techniques for IT \u2013 GET. IT\u201d which is part of the \u201cIT Governance\u201d project. He briefly explained basic details about his SAI and department
\n(SEFTI – Department of IT Audit) and also provided latest update on the GET. IT project i.e. its scope, approaches, history and next steps to be taken. <\/p>\n

He informed that the first draft of the IT governance guide is ready and its more refined version will be sent for comments by the end of this year so that the complete product can be presented at the next meeting<\/p>\n

Agenda item No. 6: Work Plan (2014-2016): Progress report on Project – 2 titled “Data Mining as a Tool in Fraud Investigation<\/h2>\n

A short introduction of SAI-South Africa and its mandate was given by Mr. Tobias Johannes Bruyns. He then presented the latest project timeline and described briefly the guide, its usage and status. The project team would finalise and submit the guide before 2016 WGITA for approval.<\/p>\n

He also asked the participants whether they are willing to participate in a survey, his SAI wants to issue, to identify how data analytics is being used in different SAIs. In response to queries, Mr. Tobias clarified that the tool could be used at the planning stage on even before and that corruption is also included in the definition of fraud.<\/p>\n

Agenda item No. 7: Work Plan (2014-2016): Progress report on Project-3 titled “Development of Standards for State Information Systems and Project Audit”<\/h2>\n

Mr. Andrey Abramov presented progress report of the WGITA project led by SAI of Russian Federation. He proposed to change the name of the standard as “Standard for State Information Systems”<\/strong> in view of the fact that the word Project is understood in their practice as a technical document determining the hard, soft and information components of the information system (IS) under development. He presented the current status of Standard for State Information Systems Audit. He explained the new ideas and visions that have been introduced by the project members during the course of the project. He then briefly shared the revised structure of the standard containing 10 domains. <\/p>\n

Taking into consideration all the necessary adjustments introduced into the document i.e. its name, structure, content and correct wording of the text, he hoped that the result of the work will be produced by the end of this year. <\/p>\n

After detailed discussions on the need for changing the project title and structure, it was decided that SAI-Russia could
\ncomplete the project as proposed by the end of the year and the same would be circulated to members for comments.
\nAdecision could then be made about the revised project title & structure.<\/p>\n

Agenda item No. 8: Work Plan (2014-2016): Progress report on Project-4 titled
\n“Development of Data Interface Standard for Accounting Software”<\/h2>\n

Ms. Li Yang from SAI-China presented the progress report describing briefly the projects background, roadmap, the work done and the working draft of the document. Comments received from SAIs of India and Poland on the proposed working draft were also shared during the meeting. <\/p>\n

It was decided that SAI-China will submit the final version of the draft document after considering the following remarks of participants \u2013
\n (i) measures to ensure quality of data;
\n(ii) relationship between XBRL and XML format; and (iii) its applicability for
\naccounting systems and different levels of financial reporting.
SAI-China also confirmed
\nthat the issue of whether it will be an open or licensed standard will be discussed further in the project team.<\/p>\n

Agenda item No. 9: Work Plan (2014-2016): Progress report on Project-5 titled “Development of ISSAI-5300 on
\n‘Guidelines on IT Audits\u201d<\/h2>\n

Mr. K. S. Subramanian from SAI-India gave an account of the activities completed on the project \u201cDevelopment of ISSAI 5300: Guidelines on IT Audits\u201d since last WGITA meeting in Kuwaitin April, 2014. He stated that the Project Team had also finalised a detailed IT Audit Questionnaires aimed at generating a comprehensive database covering IT Audit practices, standards and manuals in use, etc. in order to determine the IT Audit related maturity and profile of SAIs world-wide. Till date, only 52 SAIs have responded to the questionnaires. Once completed, the Project Team would use the database for deriving required inputs for framing the ISSAI.\n<\/p>\n

Mr. Subramanian also stated that the SAI-India Team had also prepared a skeletal draft of ISSAI 5300 in May 2015 which was circulated amongst all WGITA members\/observers for comments\/suggestions (if any) in June 2015. The project team however, proposed to revise the schedule in view of the fact that the project schedule approved by the KSC in October 2014 underestimated the multiple levels of approvals and endorsements required, as well as the complexity involved in arriving at a universally acceptable draft. The Project Team would now attempt to finalise the draft ISSAI and then seek approval of the exposure draft by the WGITA and the KSC through email exchanges.<\/p>\n

After discussions, the Working Group approved the proposal for revision of project schedule and for seeking approval of the exposure draft from WGITA members\/observers through email exchanges. The Group also agreed that the standard 5300 should be a concise document with reference to other INTOSAI products, as having a detailed self-contained standard would require frequent updates.<\/p>\n

Agenda item No. 10: A brief report on the project \u2018Audit Management System\u2019 <\/h2>\n

Mr. K. S. Subramanian from SAI-India briefly familiarized participants about the Audit Management System, its advantages, design features, implementation risk, etc. He stated that several commercial products are readily available in market. However, they are expensive and the products do not fully meet SAIs\u2019 unique needs. He further stated that they are working in collaboration with the IDI for development of Audit Management System. A Survey\/interview will be conducted in 2015 to identify\/finalise requirements and detailed Work Plan for development\/testing\/rollout will be presented in 2016 WGITA. Mr. Subramanian also asked the participants whether they would be interested in software development on audit management system.<\/p>\n

Mr. Pawel Banas of SAI-Poland promised to share the results of an EUROSAI project to finalise the requirements for development of such a software. It was decided that a survey would be sent by SAI-India within the next few months to ascertain the needs for the development of AMS.<\/p>\n

Agenda item No. 11: Report of AFROSAI-E on cooperation with WGITA<\/h2>\n

Mr. Fredrick Bobo from AFROSAI-E made a presentation on AFROSAI-E\u2019s cooperation with WGITA. He briefly described the background of the AFROSAI-E, their capacity building approaches, their Strategic imperatives from 2009, use of IT in Audit, strategic imperatives 2015-2019, etc. He then gave an account of its previous and current projects in the region as well as future plans and its cooperation with the WGITA. AFROSAI-E agreed to share the results of its survey on electronic working papers with SAI-India, WGITA Secretariat.<\/p>\n

Agenda item No. 12: Report of ISACA on cooperation with WGITA<\/h2>\n

Mr. Thomas Lamm expressed his appreciation to all the participants and the institutions they represented, for their effort
\nto improve the shape of their governments and countries. He gave a brief presentation on the ISACA, its main areas of interest and its cooperation with the INTOSAI.<\/p>\n

Agenda item No. 13: Report of IDI on cooperation with WGITA<\/h2>\n

Mr. K. S. Subramanian from SAI-India presented IDI report on cooperation with WGITA on behalf of IDI who participated in this meeting via teleconference. Mr. Subramanian described the WGITA IDI handbook, the capacity development program on IT
\naudit supporting SAIs in enhancing their IT audit capacity and the plans for the future cooperation with WGITA<\/p>\n

Agenda item No. 14: WGITA\u2019s role in management of Big Data<\/h2>\n

Mr. K. S. Subramanian from SAI-India started his presentation with the definition of big data and then he briefly described the process and aim of big data analysis, opportunities and challenges, etc. He stated that the WGITA could provide guidance on best practices that the SAIs could embrace to adapt their audit design procedures and methodologies to the changing order of big data environment. He further stated that the practical guidance could be made available to SAIs by WGITA on Digital Auditing, data Analytics and moving from sample to whole.<\/p>\n

Agenda item No.15: Country Paper presentations and discussions thereon (Australia, Bangladesh, Iran, Japan, Malaysia
\nand Pakistan)<\/h2>\n

Another important role of the Working Group on IT Audit is to promote and share best practices and methods in Information Technology related audits and to facilitate exchange of information and experience. Accordingly, sixmember SAIs viz.
\nAustralia, Bangladesh, Japan, Iran, Malaysia and Pakistan<\/strong> presented country papers on the following topics\n<\/p>\n

(i) Improving Australian Government agencies\u2019 ICT security posture (SAI-Australia)<\/strong><\/p>\n

Mr. Alex Doyle from SAI – Australia presented a country paper on \u201cImproving Australian Government agencies\u2019 ICT security
\nposture\u201d. He stated that the Australian National Audit Office (ANAO) had conducted an audit examining several Australian Government agencies\u2019 compliance with the information security requirements of the Protective Security Policy Framework (PSPF). The Performance Audit Report No. 50 of 2013-14 on \u201cCyber Attacks: Securing Agencies\u2019 ICT Systems\u201d was tabled in the parliament in June 2014. He also highlighted major audit findings from the report.<\/p>\n

(ii) Initiatives by SAI – Bangladesh to implement IT audits (SAI-Bangladesh)<\/strong><\/p>\n

Mr. Md. Aftabuzzaman from SAI – Bangladesh gave a short presentation on the initiatives taken up by SAI-Bangladesh
\nto implement IT audits. He familiarized the participants with some basic facts about both Bangladesh and his institution. He also presented features of the IT Strategic Plan and Strategic Plan of SAI Bangladesh and details of the <\/p>\n

ICT infrastructure in his SAI. He also stated that SAI – Bangladesh haddeveloped an IT Audit manual to guide the
\naudit teams in ensuring conduct of quality audit<\/p>\n

iii) SANA, Electronic Auditing System (SAI-Iran)<\/strong><\/p>\n

Mr. Ali Rashidi briefly described the electronic auditing system called SANA. The SANA is regarded as one of the biggest projects of the state information technology, and it included six parts: Software, Data Center, Infrastructure, Training and Culture Making, Developing Working Principles, and Security and Connection Management. He stated
\nthat SANA\u2019s goal is to transfer all jobs that computers can do from human to machines in order to increase speed, precision, accuracy and comprehensiveness of monitoring and auditing, improve the availability of comprehensive information of auditees, facilitate the analysis of information by using CAAT techniques and automate processes of auditing (AMS).<\/p>\n

(iv)Summaries of “shiteki” cases regarding “IT\u201d in a recent audit report (SAI-Japan)<\/strong><\/p>\n

Ms. Kae Kobayashi from SAI-Japan madea presentation on “shiteki” cases regarding “IT” in a recent audit report of SAI of Japan. She explained the social-legal concept of the word \u201cshiteki\u201d (which literally means \u201cpointing out\u201d) and also
\ngaveexamples of such cases described in her SAI reports.<\/p>\n

(v)IT Audit: Issues, lessons learnt and actions for a successful IT System implementation (SAI-Malaysia); <\/p>\n

Ms. Carolina Muyang Lileng from SAI-Malaysia madea presentation on \u201cIT AUDIT: ISSUES, LESSONS LEARNT AND ACTIONS FOR A SUCCESSFUL IT SYSTEM IMPLEMENTATION\u201d. She shared an overview of technology development in the
\nMalaysian Public Service and described the experiences in IT audits of the National Audit Department of Malaysia\u2019s (NADM). She highlighted some audit issues and lessons learnt as well as actions taken in order to successfully implement IT system. <\/p>\n

(vi) Enhancing the Scope of Financial Audit using IT Audit Techniques (SAI-Pakistan).<\/strong><\/p>\n

Mr. Muhammad Ali Farooq Gheba from SAI-Pakistan madea presentation on enhancing the scope of financial audit using IT audit techniques. He explained the impact of IT environment in conducting Financial Audits. He also stated that the Financial Auditor needs to go beyond numbers and the IT Audit techniques plays a significant role in this change of perspective<\/p>\n

All the above country paper presentations were appreciated by the members of the Working Group.
\nThe Chairman expressed his gratitude to the SAIs of Australia, Bangladesh, Japan, Iran, Malaysia and Pakistan
\nfor sharing their experiences with the Working Group.The Chairman also stated that that these presentations have been
\nenriching and educative.<\/p>\n

Agenda item No. 16: Presentation on WGITA-IDI Handbook on IT Audit<\/h2>\n

Mr. Madhav Panwar from SAI-USA familiarized the participants with the WGITA-IDI Handbook on IT Audit i.e. its origins, what it is and how to use it, etc. He also presented aproposal for its update and asked for volunteers to join the project. He also informed about the e-learning course on the handbook hosted by IDI<\/p>\n

Appreciating the utility of the Handbook, it was decided that the work of updating of the Handbook will be discussed further with IDI.<\/p>\n

Agenda item No. 17: Discussion on preparation for the 25th meeting of WGITA<\/h2>\n

It was unanimously decided in the 22nd WGITA meeting held in April 2013 at Vilnius, Lithuania that the 25th
\nWGITA meeting would be hosted by SAI-Brazil in 2016. Accordingly, Mr. Vital Rogo Filho from SAI-Brazil gave an update on the preparations for the next meeting and invited participants to Brazil for the next WGITA meeting.
\nThe Chairman thanked SAI-Brazil for their gracious offer to host the next meeting of WGITA and also for apprising
\nthe members on the preparations for the meeting.<\/p>\n

Agenda item No. 18: Discussion on venue for the 26thmeeting of WGITA<\/h2>\n

Mr. Shashi Kant Sharma stated that in order to identify host of the 26th WGITA meeting, the SAIs of Bangladesh, Georgia, Korea, Slovenia, Switzerland, UK, USA and Zimbabwe were requested to inform whether their SAI wishes to host the 26th
\nWGITA Meeting in 2017. In response, SAI-Korea has expressed their willingness to host the 26th meeting.
\nMr. Sharma expressed his gratitude for SAI – Korea\u2019s willingness to host the 2017 WGITA meeting. <\/p>\n

The representative of the SAI of South Korea invited all the members of the WGITA and expressed his gratitude to the SAI-India for sharing its experience and practices with other members of the group.<\/p>\n

Agenda item No. 19: Any other item for discussion with permission of the Chair<\/h2>\n

Mr. K. S. Subramanian from SAI-India reminded about the request of SAI of South Africa (Please refer to Agenda Item No.6)
\nto distribute a survey on data analytics among all the Working Group members. Since the survey could betime consuming,
\nit was agreed that SAI-South Africa would send the electronic version to the SAI of India who in turn will circulate it among the group. Mr. Tobias Johannes Bruyns thanked the participants for their willingness to take part in the survey and stated that he
\nis looking forward to receiving their feedback.<\/p>\n

Agenda item No. 20: Closing Remarks and summing up<\/h2>\n

Mr. Krzysztof Kwiatkowski, President of the Polish Supreme Audit Office thanked participants for their involvement in the groups\u2019 work and for two days of fruitful meeting. He also thanked the Chair for effectively organizing the workflow during the meeting.<\/p>\n

Mr. Shashi Kant Sharma, Comptroller and Auditor General of India and Chairman, WGITA summarized the discussions at the meeting and thanked the participants for their presentations. He also expressed his appreciation to all members for the significant progress made during two days of hard work. He mentioned that the decisions taken during this meeting would guide the Working Group in achieving the objectives for which it was constituted. The Chairman also conveyed his gratitude to SAI-Brazil and SAI-Korea for agreeing to host the 25th and 26th WGITA meetings, respectively.<\/p>\n

Mr. Sharma also thanked Mr. Krzysztof Kwiatkowski, President of the Polish Supreme Audit Office and his officers for
\nsuccessfully organizing and hosting the 24th WGITA meeting and expressed his gratitude to all the members of the Group for their active participation and support to the proceedings. He also thanked the IDI, ISACA and AFROSAI-E for their cooperation with the Working Group.<\/p>\n

**********************<\/p>\n

\n

Annexure<\/strong><\/p>\n

List of the participants<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
#<\/th>\nCountry<\/th>\nName<\/th>\nStatus<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n
1.<\/td>\nAustralia<\/td>\nMr. Alex Doyle<\/td>\nMember<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2.<\/td>\nBangladesh<\/td>\nMr. Md. Aftabuzzaman<\/td>\nMember<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
3.<\/td>\nBangladesh<\/td>\nMr.Masud Ahmed<\/td>\nMember<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
4.<\/td>\nBangladesh<\/td>\nMr.Mohammed Maisur Mahmood Chowdhury<\/td>\nMember<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
5.<\/td>\nBhutan<\/td>\nMs.Tshering Dema<\/td>\nMember<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
6.<\/td>\nBhutan<\/td>\nMr.Jamtsho<\/td>\nMember<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
7.<\/td>\nBhutan<\/td>\nMr.Tshering Wangchuk<\/td>\nMember<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
8.<\/td>\nBrazil<\/td>\nMr.Daniel Jezini<\/td>\nMember<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
9.<\/td>\nBrazil<\/td>\nMr. Vital Rogo Filho<\/td>\nMember<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
10.<\/td>\nChina<\/td>\nMs. Xing Liu<\/td>\nMember<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
11.<\/td>\nChina<\/td>\nMs.Li Yang<\/td>\nMember<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
12.<\/td>\nChina<\/td>\nMr.Qiang Yin<\/td>\nMember<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
13.<\/td>\nCongo<\/td>\nMr.Anasthasie Kalubi Muamba<\/td>\nMember<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
14.<\/td>\nCongo<\/td>\nMr.Heritier Luyindamo Diavanga<\/td>\nMember<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
15.<\/td>\nCongo<\/td>\nMr.Beni Miantezila Sosani<\/td>\nMember<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
16.<\/td>\nCongo<\/td>\nMr.Dan Ziala Ziala<\/td>\nMember<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
17.<\/td>\nEcuador<\/td>\nMr. Nelson Duenas Lopez<\/td>\nMember<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
18.<\/td>\nEcuador<\/td>\nMr. Carlos Polit Faggioni<\/td>\nMember<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
19.<\/td>\nFinland<\/td>\nMr. Pasi Korhonen<\/td>\nMember<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
20.<\/td>\nGeorgia<\/td>\nMr. Ivane Shavdatuashvili<\/td>\nMember<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
21.<\/td>\nIndia<\/td>\nMr.Shashi Kant Sharma<\/td>\nMember<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
22.<\/td>\nIndia<\/td>\nMr. K. S. Subramanian<\/td>\nMember<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
23.<\/td>\nIndia<\/td>\nMr. Kulwant Singh<\/td>\nMember<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
24.<\/td>\nIndia<\/td>\nMr. Anadi Misra<\/td>\nMember<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
25.<\/td>\nIndonesia<\/td>\nMrs.Ria Anugriani<\/td>\nMember<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
26.<\/td>\nIndonesia<\/td>\nMrs.Sylvia Ika Oktavi<\/td>\nMember<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
27.<\/td>\nIndonesia<\/td>\nMr.Agus Joko Pramono<\/td>\nMember<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
28.<\/td>\nIndonesia<\/td>\nMr.Rochmadi Saptogiri<\/td>\nMember<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
29.<\/td>\nIran<\/td>\nMr. Gholamreza Bazgosha<\/td>\nMember<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
30.<\/td>\nIran<\/td>\nMr. Ali Rashidi<\/td>\nMember<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
31.<\/td>\nJapan<\/td>\nMr. Hideki Fujii<\/td>\nMember<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
32.<\/td>\nJapan<\/td>\nMs. Kae Kobayashi<\/td>\nMember<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
33.<\/td>\nKuwait<\/td>\nMr. Abdulaziz Alansari<\/td>\nMember<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
34.<\/td>\nKuwait<\/td>\nMr. Faisal Alhaqan<\/td>\nMember<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
35.<\/td>\nKuwait<\/td>\nMs. Rawan Alsubaie<\/td>\nMember<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
36.<\/td>\nLithuania<\/td>\nMr. Dainius Jakimavi\u010dius<\/td>\nMember<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
37.<\/td>\nLithuania<\/td>\nMs.Carolina Muyang Lileng<\/td>\nMember<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
38.<\/td>\nNorway<\/td>\nMr. Stig Folkvord<\/td>\nMember<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
39.<\/td>\nNorway<\/td>\nMr. Andreas F\u00f8rde<\/td>\nMember<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
40.<\/td>\nNorway<\/td>\nMs. Magnhild Kaasin<\/td>\nMember<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
41.<\/td>\nPakistan<\/td>\nMr. Muhammad Ali Farooq Gheba<\/td>\nMember<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
42.<\/td>\nPoland<\/td>\nMr. Pawe\u0142 Bana\u015b<\/td>\nMember<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
43.<\/td>\nRussia<\/td>\nMr. Andrey Abramov<\/td>\nMember<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
44.<\/td>\nRussia<\/td>\nMs. Elena Vasilieva<\/td>\nMember<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
45.<\/td>\nSlovakia<\/td>\nMrs. Zuzana Martincov\u00e1<\/td>\nMember<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
46.<\/td>\nSouth Africa<\/td>\nMr. Tobias Johannes Bruyns<\/td>\nMember<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
47.<\/td>\nSouth Africa<\/td>\nMrs. Catharina Petronella Ferreira <\/td>\nMember<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
48.<\/td>\nSouth Korea<\/td>\nMr. Jinwon Ho<\/td>\nMember<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
49.<\/td>\nSouth Korea<\/td>\nMr. Changyu Kim<\/td>\nMember<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
50.<\/td>\nSwitzerland<\/td>\nMr. Bernhard Hamberger<\/td>\nMember<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
51.<\/td>\nUnited States<\/td>\nMr. Madhav Panwar<\/td>\nMember<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
52.<\/td>\nZimbabwe<\/td>\nMrs. Emily Dzinouya<\/td>\nMember<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
53.<\/td>\nZimbabwe<\/td>\nMrs. Jemmima Muzamhindo<\/td>\nMember<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
54.<\/td>\nAFROSAI-E<\/td>\nMr. Fredrick Bobo<\/td>\nObserver<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
55.<\/td>\nISACA<\/td>\nMr. Thomas Lamm<\/td>\nObserver<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
56.<\/td>\nISACA<\/td>\nMr. Krishna Seeburn<\/td>\nObserver<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
57.<\/td>\nMalta<\/td>\nMr. Simon Camilleri<\/td>\nObserver<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n

Download Agenda<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n

<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Minutes of the 24th Meeting of the INTOSAI Working Group on IT Audit (Warsaw, Poland, 29 and 30 June 2015) Minutes Download The 24th meeting of the INTOSAI Working Group on IT Audit (WGITA) was held at Warsaw, Poland on 29 and 30 June 2015. The WGITA participants were also invited by SAI – Poland … Continue reading “24 Meeting Minutes of 24th wgita poland”<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":181,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"full-width.php","meta":{"footnotes":""},"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/wgita.intosaicommunity.net\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/755"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/wgita.intosaicommunity.net\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/wgita.intosaicommunity.net\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wgita.intosaicommunity.net\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wgita.intosaicommunity.net\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=755"}],"version-history":[{"count":8,"href":"https:\/\/wgita.intosaicommunity.net\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/755\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1449,"href":"https:\/\/wgita.intosaicommunity.net\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/755\/revisions\/1449"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wgita.intosaicommunity.net\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/181"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/wgita.intosaicommunity.net\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=755"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}